FR-4915-01-P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36759]
Tarantula Corporation—Acquisition of Control Exemption—Texas Central
Railroad Company
By petition filed on March 22, 2024, Tarantula Corporation (Tarantula), seeks an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 11323 to acquire control of Texas Central Railroad Company (Texas Central),
a Class III carrier, through the purchase of all outstanding Texas Central capital stock
from Birdsong Corporation (Birdsong).1 As discussed below, the Board will grant the
exemption.
BACKGROUND
Tarantula is a noncarrier holding company that controls Fort Worth & Western
Railroad Company (FWWR), Fort Worth & Dallas Railroad Company, and Fort Worth &
Dallas Belt Railroad Company, all of which are Class III rail carriers. (Pet. 1 & n.1); see
also Tarantula Corp.—Continuance in Control Exemption—Fort Worth & Dall. Belt
R.R., FD 32515 (ICC served July 25, 1994).
Pursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated March 21, 2024, Tarantula has
reached an agreement to acquire from Birdsong all of the outstanding capital stock of
Texas Central. (See Pet., Ex. B at 1.) Upon consummation of this transaction, Tarantula
would indirectly control Texas Central. (Id.) According to the petition, Texas Central
owns—but does not operate—24.9 miles of rail line running from Dublin, Tex., to
Gorman, Tex. (the Line). (Pet. 2.) FWWR, a Tarantula subsidiary, has leased and

Texas Central Railroad Company is a separate and distinct entity from Texas
Central Partners, LLC, which is proposing to construct high-speed passenger rail between
Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston, Tex.

operated the Line since 1998. (Id.); see also Fort Worth & W. R.R.—Acquis.
Exemption—S. Orient R.R., FD 33681 (STB served Nov. 30, 1998).2
In support of the petition, Tarantula asserts that the transaction will allow it to
make capital improvements to infrastructure on the Line. (Pet. 3, 7.) Tarantula states
that, as FWWR already operates over the Line, the transaction will not affect the level of
operations or maintenance of the Line or any of the other lines operated by the other
railroads in the Tarantula corporate family. (Id. at 6-7.) Tarantula has attached to the
petition letters supporting the transaction from both shippers located on the Line,
Birdsong and Gorman Milling Company, Inc. (See Pet., Ex. C.) Tarantula has also asked
the Board for expedited consideration of its petition and a decision issued and effective
by June 15, 2024. (Pet. 7.) Tarantula states that it would like an earlier effective date to
commence infrastructure improvements on a faster schedule in support of increased
safety, improved reliability, enhanced efficiency, and improved connectivity which can
lead to greater marketability and competitiveness for communities and businesses in the
rural area served by FWWR. (Id.) Tarantula further states that an earlier effective date
would support an expansion project and make a stronger application for a CRISI
grant. (Id.)

Texas Central’s Line connects with FWWR’s rail line at Dublin. Tarantula
explains that, for that reason, the transaction does not qualify for the class exemption
under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). (Pet. 1.)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The acquisition of control of a rail carrier by a person that is not a rail carrier but
that controls any number of rail carriers requires prior approval from the Board under
49 U.S.C. 11323(a)(5). Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a), however, the Board shall, to the
maximum extent consistent with title 49, subtitle IV, part A, exempt a transaction or
service from regulation upon finding that (1) the regulation is not necessary to carry out
the rail transportation policy (RTP) under 49 U.S.C. 10101 and (2) either the transaction
or service is of limited scope, or regulation is not needed to protect shippers from the
abuse of market power.
Here, an exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25
is consistent with the standards of 49 U.S.C. 10502. Detailed scrutiny of the proposed
transaction through an application for review and approval under sections 11323-25 is not
necessary to carry out the RTP. An exemption would promote the RTP by minimizing
the need for federal regulatory control over the transaction, 49 U.S.C. 10101(2), reducing
regulatory barriers to entry, 49 U.S.C. 10101(7), encouraging efficient management of
railroads, 49 U.S.C. 10101(9), and providing for the expeditious resolution of this
proceeding, 49 U.S.C. 10101(15). Further, Tarantula asserts that the acquisition will
allow it to make capital improvements to infrastructure on the Line. (Pet. 3, 7.)
Therefore, an exemption would promote the RTP by ensuring the development and
continuation of a sound rail transportation system that would continue to meet the needs
of the public, 49 U.S.C. 10101(4), and fostering sound economic conditions in
transportation, 49 U.S.C. 10101(5). Other aspects of the RTP would not be adversely
affected.

Regulation of the transaction is not needed to protect shippers from abuse of
market power.3 The record indicates that Texas Central does not conduct freight rail
operations over the Line; rather, FWWR has leased and operated the Line since 1998.
(Pet. 2.) Tarantula states that the transaction will have no adverse effect on rail
operations over the Line because FWWR will continue operations over it. (Id. at 1, 5.)
Thus, the proposed transaction will not result in any material changes to the services
available to shippers along the Line. Moreover, there have been no objections to the
proposed transaction, and the shippers along the Line have filed letters supporting the
transaction. (Pet., Ex. C.)
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to protect the interests of its employees.
Section 11326(c), however, does not provide for labor protection for transactions under
sections 11324 and 11325 that involve only Class III carriers. Therefore, because all
carriers involved in the transaction are Class III carriers, the Board may not impose labor
protective conditions.
The acquisition of control is exempt from environmental reporting requirements
under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(1) because it will not result in significant changes in carrier
operations. Similarly, under 49 CFR 1105.8(b)(3), no historic report is required because
the proposed transaction will not substantially change the level of operations or
maintenance of railroad properties.
As noted, Tarantula has requested expedited consideration of its petition for
exemption. The Board finds that Tarantula’s request is reasonable under the
circumstances. Accordingly, the effective date of the exemption will be June 15, 2024.
See 49 CFR 1121.4(e) (“Unless otherwise specified in the decision, an exemption

Given this finding, the Board need not determine whether the transaction is
limited in scope. See 49 U.S.C. 10502(a).

generally will be effective 30 days from the service date of the decision.”). Petitions for
stay must be filed by June 7, 2024. Petitions to reopen will be due by June 20, 2024.
It is ordered:
1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board exempts the above transaction from the
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25.
2. Notice of this exemption will be published in the Federal Register.
3. This decision will be effective on June 15, 2024. Petitions for stay must be
filed by June 7, 2024. Petitions to reopen must be filed by June 20, 2024.
Decided: May 30, 2024.
By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-12259 Filed: 6/4/2024 8:45 am; Publication Date: 6/5/2024]